• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

DigiBanker

Bringing you cutting-edge new technologies and disruptive financial innovations.

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In

UnGPT.ai offers specialized tools for refining AI-generated text to appear more human-like, focusing on tone and flow enhancements

May 23, 2025 //  by Finnovate

In the book “More Than Words,” writer-educator John Warner makes the case for renewing the concept of writing as a fundamentally human activity. Warner has argued before that much of what LLMs will destroy deserves to be destroyed. We should, he argues, take the advent of chatbots as “an opportunity to reconsider exactly what we value and why we value those things.” In education, writing has become performance rather than communication, and if we want students to simply follow a robotic algorithm to create a language product–well, that is exactly the task that a LLM is well-suited to perform. Warner encourages us to resist “technological determinism,” the argument that AI is inevitable and therefore we should neither resist or regulate it, as well as the huge hype, the manufactured sense that this is the future and you must get on board. Warner also points out the constant tendency to anthropomorphize AI, even though it is a machine that does not think, understand, or empathize, folks are constantly projecting those qualities onto the AI. Warner encourages renewing the sense of and appreciation for the human. And he calls on readers to explore their understanding of the field, in particular finding guides, people who have invested the time and study and thought to provide deeper insights into this growing field.  At one point Warner responds to the notion that AI somehow improves on human work, noting that LLMs are machine. “To declare the machines superior means believing that what makes humans human is inherently inferior.” To those who argue that chatbots teamed up with humans will be able to create more, better, faster writing, Warner says no. “I’ll tell you why not. Because ChatGPT cannot write. Generating syntax is not the same thing as writing. Writing is an embodied act of thinking and feeling. Writing in communicating with intention. Yes, the existence of a product at the end of the process is an indicator that writing has happened, but by itself, it does not define what writing is or what it means to the writer or the audience for that writing.”

Read Article

Category: Additional Reading

Previous Post: « Success of Pix and UPI is paving way for a three-stage framework for state-led fast payment systems that involves weighting pre-requisites, implementation and scaling and establishing engagement mechanisms and regulatory adjustments

Copyright © 2025 Finnovate Research · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy
Finnovate Research · Knyvett House · Watermans Business Park · The Causeway Staines · TW18 3BA · United Kingdom · About · Contact Us · Tel: +44-20-3070-0188

We use cookies to provide the best website experience for you. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkayPrivacy policy