• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

DigiBanker

Bringing you cutting-edge new technologies and disruptive financial innovations.

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In

California’s AI Bill 53 lays out a clearer path to harmonize California’s standards with federal ones but the reporting requirements could be onerous for startups and tilt the playing field toward established giants that already employ large compliance teams

October 3, 2025 //  by Finnovate

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the California AI bill into law on Monday, requiring leading AI companies to disclose safety details about their most advanced systems, placing the state once again at the forefront of tech regulation. Those in support of the new law, Senate Bill 53, known as the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, highlight that it provides the needed safeguards while still allowing innovation to flourish. Critics warn it could impose compliance burdens that will ripple through the industry nationwide. This AI law could establish a new baseline for AI standards across the United States. The California AI bill could mark the start of a “Sacramento effect” in AI. Proponents argue the bill increases accountability without stifling innovation. By focusing on transparency, it avoids freezing a rapidly evolving field. Chris Lehane, chief global affairs officer at OpenAI, posted on LinkedIn that the law “lays out a clearer path to harmonize California’s standards with federal ones. Detractors, particularly some industry voices, caution that the reporting requirements could be onerous for startups and tilt the playing field toward established giants that already employ large compliance teams. Collin McCune, head of government affairs at the venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, echoed the concerns with fragmentation posting on X: “The biggest danger of SB 53 is that it sets a precedent for states, rather than the federal government, to take the lead in governing the national AI market – creating a patchwork of 50 compliance regimes that startups don’t have the resources to navigate.”

Read Article

Category: Additional Reading

Previous Post: « Sibos: upgrading to ledgers with cryptographically verifiable state, DLT systems could finally synchronize and interoperate directly
Next Post: DoorDash launches proprietary delivery robot built to travel on bike lanes, roads, sidewalks and driveways that is specifically designed for local delivery »

Copyright © 2025 Finnovate Research · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy
Finnovate Research · Knyvett House · Watermans Business Park · The Causeway Staines · TW18 3BA · United Kingdom · About · Contact Us · Tel: +44-20-3070-0188

We use cookies to provide the best website experience for you. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.