• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

DigiBanker

Bringing you cutting-edge new technologies and disruptive financial innovations.

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In

Ripple XRP Ledger is ‘uniquely suited’ for RWA for its instant low-fee settlement, built-in market making, on-ledger compliance, and full asset lifecycle composability

August 18, 2025 //  by Finnovate

Ripple Senior Vice President Markus Infanger, the head of RippleX, argues the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is built for the next phase of real-world-asset tokenization and says SPV-heavy market is only a bridge to “native issuance.” Infanger’s case for XRPL centers on protocol-level capabilities intended for financial use from the outset, which he argues reduce integration work and operational risk for institutions moving from SPVs toward native issuance: On-ledger exchange (built-in DEX): XRPL includes a native order-book exchange, allowing issued tokens to trade directly on the ledger without external smart-contract routers. For tokenized RWAs, that can mean immediate listing and peer-to-peer execution with fewer moving parts. Near-instant, low-cost settlement: The ledger’s consensus design targets fast finality and minimal transaction fees, a combination Infanger says is critical for high-volume instruments — such as tokenized T-bills — where carry, fees and operational latency matter. XLS-30 automated market maker (AMM): This standard introduces on-ledger liquidity pools that algorithmically set prices based on inventory, so tokens can trade even when a matching order isn’t present. For RWA markets that need continuous two-way prices — rather than episodic RFQs — on-ledger AMMs can help stabilize liquidity. XLS-65 lending vaults: A proposed standard for protocol-level borrowing and lending. Instead of building bespoke smart contracts, issuers could enable secured credit (for example, borrowing against a tokenized note or real-estate claim) with rules defined at the standard level, aiding auditability and risk controls. Programmable compliance and custody hooks: Because issuance, exchange, and settlement live in the base protocol, Infanger argues that rule sets (whitelists, transfer restrictions, disclosures) and custody workflows can be embedded directly into asset lifecycles — supporting regulatory alignment as volumes scale.Composability: With exchange, liquidity, lending and issuance primitives designed to interoperate, tokens can move through primary issuance, secondary trading, collateralization and settlement without stitching together multiple external systems. Infanger urges banks, asset managers, and treasurers to use SPVs for now but plan for native issuance. He believes a public, finance-focused ledger with built-in exchange, liquidity and credit standards will speed the shift and make on-ledger assets work like mainstream instruments.

Read Article

Category: Crypto & Blockchain, Innovation Topics

Previous Post: « BIS proposes risk grading for blockchain wallets to bolster AML—scores based on fund sources, enabling screening at off-ramps to protect traditional financial systems
Next Post:  Moody Ratings says stablecoin growth could cause a 1% decrease in both bank assets and bank lending — that is, a $325 billion reduction, as issuers favor Treasuries for reserves, raising systemic financial concerns »

Copyright © 2025 Finnovate Research · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy
Finnovate Research · Knyvett House · Watermans Business Park · The Causeway Staines · TW18 3BA · United Kingdom · About · Contact Us · Tel: +44-20-3070-0188

We use cookies to provide the best website experience for you. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.