• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

DigiBanker

Bringing you cutting-edge new technologies and disruptive financial innovations.

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Features
    • Overview Of Features
    • Search
    • Favorites
  • Share!
  • Log In

Mitigating run risks from payment stablecoins would require enacting regulatory provisions such as prescriptive reserve composition standards, maturity limits on reserve assets and mandatory deposit of cash reserves at FDIC-insured banks

May 30, 2025 //  by Finnovate

Payment stablecoins and MMFs share a crucial structural similarity in their susceptibility to run risk during financial stress. Both are designed to provide investors with a stable, cash equivalent asset, backed by underlying reserves — but neither is explicitly guaranteed by the government. As policymakers consider stablecoin regulations, it is essential to recognize the parallels between stablecoins and MMFs, particularly regarding run risks and potential threats to financial stability. Drawing on lessons from past MMF reforms, regulators have the opportunity to craft a regulatory framework for stablecoins that mirrors the credit and liquidity safeguards applied to MMFs. To mitigate systemic vulnerabilities, stablecoin regulation could include the following provisions: Credit quality requirements for reserve assets backing payment stablecoins; Prescriptive reserve composition standards, limiting assets to cash and high-quality liquid securities; Liquidity requirements, such as a minimum percentage of reserves in daily and weekly liquid assets; Maturity limits on reserve assets to reduce duration risk; Liquidity fees triggered when liquid assets fall below predefined thresholds; Custodian requirements mandating securities and other noncash assets reserves be held at regulated custodians; Cash reserves mandated to be deposited at FDIC-insured banks; Daily disclosure of the reserve assets with monthly audits, published on the issuer’s website to enhance transparency; Prohibition on the payment stablecoin issuer lending reserve assets or using reserve assets as collateral; Requiring issuers to assess through stress tests their ability to maintain a $1 net asset value under adverse scenarios;. By drawing on the regulatory lessons learned from MMFs, policymakers have an opportunity to get ahead of the curve. Implementing sensible, risk-based safeguards for stablecoins will not only protect investors and preserve financial stability but also foster growth in the digital asset space. With proactive regulation, the promise of stablecoins can be realized without repeating past mistakes.

Read Article

Category: Networks Processors & PSPs, Innovation Topics

Previous Post: « Success of Pix and UPI is paving way for a three-stage framework for state-led fast payment systems that involves weighting pre-requisites, implementation and scaling and establishing engagement mechanisms and regulatory adjustments

Copyright © 2025 Finnovate Research · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy
Finnovate Research · Knyvett House · Watermans Business Park · The Causeway Staines · TW18 3BA · United Kingdom · About · Contact Us · Tel: +44-20-3070-0188

We use cookies to provide the best website experience for you. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkayPrivacy policy